“non ospite”: neither a set nor belonging to a set…. test the *** of this paradox: -is “non ospite” existing or not? -is “non ospite” conscious or not ? -is “non ospite” thinkable or not? -is “non ospite” myself or not? -is “non ospite” “non ospite” or not ?
-is “non ospite” definible or not? -and so on… (or not?!) anyway you are thinking to something that belongs to a set… lol
: ) salve, this is my conlang (constructed language): ideolat. it is a philosophical/ideographic interpretation of capital letters of the latin alphabet. (same letter has different meaning if associated to different letter)..